<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; nuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forcedgreen.com/tag/nuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forcedgreen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Different Wind Turbine</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedgreen.com/2008/12/different-wind-turbine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedgreen.com/2008/12/different-wind-turbine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Going Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18 wheeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deviates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecogeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flatbeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jet engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light and shadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscillation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stationary structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbine blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windmill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedgreen.com/2008/12/different-wind-turbine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
	float:left;
	position: fixed;
	top: 60%;
	left: 70px;
}
#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
	float:left;
	clear:both;
	margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
	padding-bottom:2px;
}
#bottomcontainerBox {
	width: 50%;
	padding-top: 1px;
}
#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
	float: left;
	margin: 4px 4px 4px 4px;
}
</style>
I found this at EcoGeek and found it to be another interesting idea. FloDesign, a Massachusetts based engineering firm, has designed a new wind turbine that deviates from the standard windmill in a compelling way. Its main feature is a stationary piece in front that directs wind into the spinning blades. Overall, the machine looks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
	float:left;
	position: fixed;
	top: 60%;
	left: 70px;
}
#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
	float:left;
	clear:both;
	margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
	padding-bottom:2px;
}
#bottomcontainerBox {
	width: 50%;
	padding-top: 1px;
}
#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
	float: left;
	margin: 4px 4px 4px 4px;
}
</style>
<p>I found this at EcoGeek and found it to be another interesting idea.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forcedgreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/flodesign1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-541" title="flodesign1" src="http://www.forcedgreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/flodesign1-300x117.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="117" /></a></p>
<p><a title="flodesign" href="http://www.flodesign.org/technologies.html" target="_blank">FloDesign</a>, a Massachusetts based engineering firm, has designed a new wind turbine<br />
that deviates from the standard windmill in a compelling way. Its main feature is a<br />
stationary piece in front that directs wind into the spinning blades. Overall, the<br />
machine looks more like a jet engine than a wind turbine and it packs quite a punch<br />
as well – a FloDesign turbine can generate as much power as a conventional turbine<span id="more-542"></span><br />
twice its size.</p>
<p>FloDeisgn has a long list of reasons why its devices are superior to the status quo.<br />
At the top of that list is efficiency – regular turbines only capture around half<br />
of the energy stored in the wind that hits them. This is because they deflect a lot<br />
of that wind around them. The FloDesign turbine, on the other hand, sucks in that<br />
wind and utilizes much more of its energy. From a practical perspective, the smaller<br />
turbines require less material to build, are easier to install (as one example, the<br />
entire turbine could be packed onto a standard 18 wheeler, as opposed to turbine<br />
blades that require incredibly oversized flatbeds) and take up less land.</p>
<p>They claim that their design also helps solve the NIMBY problem, because people<br />
don’t have to see the huge spinning blades from miles around. I am dubious that<br />
NIMBY participants will adore large, stationary structures that much more than<br />
large, moving structures, but this design does address one often overlooked issue:<br />
when wind turbines are built near workplaces, people often have to endure ceaseless<br />
oscillation of light and shadow, which can drive them nuts. These turbines solve that<br />
problem.</p>
<p>Prototypes are scheduled for testing over the next year or so. If all goes well, we<br />
could be seeing wind farms with these things soon afterwards. If these turbines can<br />
be successfully implemented, their significance should not be underestimated. The<br />
land and money needed to build a 1 GW wind farm could be used instead to build a<br />
2-3 GW wind farm. We sometimes think that wind can only work if we build bigger,<br />
bigger bigger. FloDesign argues that, using some clever aerodynamics, we can<br />
squeeze more juice out of smaller, smaller, smaller.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpbolvw.net/click-3008948-10601294" target="_top"><br />
<img src="http://www.ftjcfx.com/image-3008948-10601294" border="0" alt="" width="468" height="60" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedgreen.com/2008/12/different-wind-turbine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

